Ancillary relief is the general term used for supplementary requests asked by a lawyer to the court in the nature of monetary requests. However in English law the same applies specifically to financial relief asked by a litigant in cases of divorce, support, alimony, judicial separation, declaration for nullity, etc. Simply put it is the litigant asking the court to command the opposing party to provide financial aid pending judgment.
Preserve the Status Quo
This allows the party who imputes wrongdoing to the other party to have financial capacity to meet obligations. This is to prevent circumvention of the law by one spouse who has the means as against the other spouse who has no financial capacity. The reason being, win or lose one spouse is duty bound to support the other.
Disadvantage 1: Delay
Theoretically speaking ancillary reliefs should not take up too much time. The problem is some experienced litigators can actually delay the entire case by challenging legal costings by or challenging the choice of law costs draftsman (London).
Disadvantage 2: Costs
Costs Draftsman (London) are not cheap. Some can command fees over and above that of the advocate. That is why in some cases, especially if the court or law does not require the same legal costings are sparingly used or done away with in its entirety. Case in point is the preference of some parties to undergo mediation to shorten the entire litigation and costing.
Disadvantage 3: Exclusive Remedies
Some reliefs are exclusive of each other permanently or temporarily. For example, spouses who signed a separation agreement are barred from filing for judicial separation four years prior to living apart. Some parties fail to disclose this fact which means that the case once filed can be dismissed for being premature.
Disadvantage 4: Court not Bound by Terms
As a general rule the court must respect out of court ancillary contracts. The problem is, sometimes one party can get away with challenging the same by prevailing upon the court to see beyond the agreement and into the fairness of the agreement. This is after very expensive legal costings and the hiring of costs draftsman (London).